Attorney Advertising

New York Legal Help


Contact Us Now!




Note: prior results do not guarantee future similar outcomes

$450,000 result ─ cited in VerdictSearch.com

PREMISES LIABILITY — Plaintiff: Building didn't police tenants' dog-walking activity

SETTLEMENT: $450,000

CASE:
Denise Mendez Rodriguez & James Rodriguez v. 125 Holding LLC, & Weiss Realty LLC, No. 26576/02

COURT: Bronx Supreme.   JUDGE: Sallie Manzanet.   COURT DATE: 10/18/2006

PLAINTIFF ATTORNEY(S): Alan M. Greenberg, Law Offices of Alan M. Greenberg, New York, NY

DEFENSE ATTORNEY(S): Robert Krause, Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis & Fishlinger, Uniondale, NY


FACTS & ALLEGATIONS


At about 6:30 a.m. on Aug. 7, 2002, plaintiff Denise Mendez Rodriguez, 20, an administrative assistant who was about four-months pregnant, slipped while descending one of the stairways of her apartment building, which was located at 125 Elliot Ave., in Yonkers. She claimed that she fell and sustained an ankle injury.

Rodriguez sued the building's owner, 125 Holdings LLC, and the building's real estate agent, Weiss Realty LLC. She alleged that the defendants were negligent in their maintenance of the premises and that their negligence created a dangerous condition.

Rodriguez claimed that she slipped in a puddle of dog urine. She contended that the building's tease prohibited pets, but that several tenants owned dogs, including the superintendent, and that there was a recurring problem of dogs being permitted to urinate inside the building and on the stairways. Rodriguez contended that she complained to the building superintendent about seeing dog urine on stairs on a prior occasion, Several other tenants were prepared to testify to the same recurring condition of urine puddles inside the building.

Rodriguez also claimed that the superintendent had actual notice of the urine puddle she slipped on by virtue of her husband having seen and reported it to the superintendent's son at 5:30 the night before her injury.

Upon information and belief, the superintendent and his family were. prepared to testify that no one ever notified them of the urine condition the night before the incident. The defendants also contended that Rodriguez was negligent for failing to notice the puddle


INJURIES/DAMAGES


Ankle, foot: fracture, ankle; plate: screws. Police and ambulance were called to the scene and confirmed that Rodriguez slipped on the stairs, She suffered a right lateral malleolus fracture with a tear of ankle ligaments. She was hospitalized for three days and underwent pen reduction and internal fixation with the placement of eight screws and a plate.

In October 2002, Rodriguez underwent a second surgery for the removal of one large screw. She lost three months from her clerical job but did not return to work due to the birth of her son in December 2002. No loss-of-earnings claim was made. She wore a hoot on her right foot for four months. She also used a walker, crutches and cane for four months. She attended physical therapy for one year. The remainder of the hardware is remaining. She is scheduled to undergo future surgery to remove scar tissue in the ankle. She walks with a limp and claims permanent pain and discomfort with limitations on walking, standing and running. Her husband claimed loss of services for four months and a current increase in his domestic chores.


RESULT:
During the day of jury selection, the parties agreed to a $450,000 settlement.

INSURER(S): New York State Insurance Department Liquidation Bureau for both defendants

PLAINTIFF EXPERT(S): Dr. David Lent, orthopedics, Yonkers, NY

DEFENSE EXPERT(S): Jacquelin Emmanuel, M.D., orthopedics, Jamaica, NY

 

— Michael Rehak